Acoustic awareness: A focus on safety for critical communication workers in demanding settings

27/03/2025

Possessing the right equipment for critical communications is vital whatever the environment. Equipment must function flawlessly, enabling your team to carry out essential daily tasks with efficiency, effectiveness, and safety in mind. How can you determine what equipment is best for your team? What sets different products apart in the market, and which ones align most closely with your needs? In this article, we gather insights from our experts, Head of Product (Accessories), John Drewnicki, and Acoustic Engineer, Adam Howe, on measures to ensure that your teams have the most appropriate and safest audio equipment tailored to their requirements.

Acoustic Awareness: A Focus on Safety for Critical Communication Workers

The complexities of noise in different industries

Every industry faces unique complexities and challenges regarding audio requirements. For instance, in the mining and oil and gas (MOG) extraction sectors, it is reported that 17 percent of workers exposed to noise have hearing impairment in both ears.1 In contrast, in Public Administration, which includes Public Safety, 28 percent of workers have experienced exposure to hazardous noise at some point during their jobs.2

UK noise regulations state that the levels of exposure to noise of employees averaged over a working day should be less than 87 dB(A). Noise exposure levels must not exceed a peak sound pressure of 140 dB(C). Any noise above this level can cause significant damage to an individual’s hearing.3

In industries where noise levels can pose a significant health risk and ‘…its impact on the human body goes far beyond damaging hearing’,4 it is paramount to consider the best hearing protection for these environments to protect your team from hearing damage or loss.

This risk needs to be balanced against being able to hear clearly and having sufficiently loud audio. That balance comes down to choosing the right accessory and managing noise exposure in a controlled way.

Individuals often focus on preventive measures to safeguard against physical injuries in the workplace or daily life, such as cuts or trips. However, auditory hazards frequently receive insufficient attention, despite being a critical aspect of health and safety. Many individuals remain unaware of the potential harm they may inflict upon their hearing during routine activities during the working day.

John Drewnicki, Head of Product (Accessories)

Current challenges in hearing conservation

Understanding acoustic risks is something that everyone should be aware of, and this includes making sure that users are checking their equipment regularly for any faults or breakages.

It is also essential to maintain a sufficient radio volume that is loud enough to ensure clear communication in noisy environments and is able to be understood while preventing hearing damage from prolonged exposure at elevated levels. In some circumstances, users can forget to reduce the volume after leaving such environments, resulting in sustained high-volume levels.

Women with ATEX Headset and RSM

Purchasing unapproved third-party audio accessories may seem like the best option in certain cases, but there are things to consider when doing so. These include:

  • Tested to official regulations: Do your research and find out if they’ve been tested to the appropriate regulations and standards levels required to protect users from hearing damage. Check for regulatory marking and ask for evidence of compliance if in doubt.
  • Compatibility: Be aware that there may be compatibility issues when connecting accessories to the radio’s RAC connector where they may not fit properly or could easily detach themselves. Also, the types of materials used to construct the accessories could impede the performance and invalidate the warranty of the radio. For example, different metals used on the side connectors could over time cause wear of connective pads, or an incorrect pitch screw could permanently damage a screw boss.
  • Total cost of ownership: Initial savings can prove expensive in the long run. Consider if the cable on an ear hanger is bent and brakes while in operation; this could potentially put a user and others in danger due to loss of communication. Having products that are tried and tested to the highest standards is crucial in any mission-critical environment. Sepura completes accelerated life testing to make sure products are robust and reliable.
  • Noise level parameters: Unapproved third-party audio equipment may not have the correct parameters to ensure clear audio levels in different scenarios. When the accessory is attached to the radio device, it may be too loud or too quiet or could be muffled, making it unreliable.

When selecting accessories for your Sepura radio, it's important to consider compatibility and functionality. Different audio level parameters must be tailored to meet the varying requirements of customers and industries. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate these factors before making a purchase, as they can impact both the user experience and the performance of the radio equipment.

John Drewnicki, Head of Product (Accessories)

Acoustic Engineers testing in the anechoic chamber Acoustic Engineers testing in the anechoic chamber

Rigorous in-house testing

Sepura carries out thorough in-house testing on all our products to ensure they perform optimally in real-world situations, including accelerated life testing where devices endure both physical stress and environmental extremes. One fundamental part of this testing at our UK headquarters involves measuring audio quality, which we achieve by using our semi-anechoic chamber. The combination of the chamber with the calibrated head and torso simulator allows us to achieve optimal and consistent audio quality standards.

The chamber is a controlled environment free from any internal or external influences. It allows the Acoustic Engineering team to take consistent and repeatable acoustic measurements, enabling accurate comparisons across different environments and setups.

Various types of audio equipment are subject to testing due to the specific needs of different industries. For instance, some sectors may require devices like single earpieces or ear hangers to maintain operational awareness. In contrast, other industries might prefer headsets or speaker microphones. As a result, it’s essential to test these diverse equipment types to ensure they meet the unique requirements of each application.

The head and torso simulator enables us to simulate various scenarios on a case-by-case basis. We can replicate the precise way a customer will position their equipment, such as an RSM attached to the shoulder and a radio attached to the chest. This approach allows us to obtain accurate readings from the tests we conduct and provide feedback to the customer on appropriate parameters and custom audio profile requirements.

Adam Howe, Acoustic Engineer

Having the right equipment for the job

Audio accessories vary in both their mechanical and acoustic designs, which can significantly impact performance. Ensuring that this equipment is fitted and used correctly is another factor. To enhance the user experience, it’s essential to fine-tune the audio parameters of the radio accordingly. Audio profiles for these accessories enable the detection and automatic adjustment of audio settings based on the connected device. Whether at a sporting event or in an office environment, users can customise specific parameters to ensure optimal sound quality and clarity. This customisation not only improves communication but also maintains a safe and appropriate volume level for all users involved.

Audio Profiles on an SC20, with RSM attached

Conclusion

Choosing the correct equipment for your users means they’ll be able to perform their roles efficiently and safely. When choosing your audio equipment, doing the research, understanding the acoustic risks and what testing has been performed will ensure a high-quality and crystal-clear audio performance whatever the environment.

References:

  1. Masterson EA, Bushnell PT, Themann CL, & Morata TC. (2016). Hearing impairment among noise-exposed workers — United States, 2003–2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(15), 389-394.
  2. Kerns E, Masterson EA, Themann CL, & Calvert GM. (2018). Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty and occupational noise exposure within U.S. industries and occupations. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 61, 477-491.
  3. Employers’ responsibilities – legal duties. Health and Safety Executive website.
  4. How our noisy world is seriously damaging our health. BBC News website.